AI safety / ethics are fake fields and merely exist to create more power brokers (twitter.com)

In a provocative assertion, a recent article claims that AI safety and ethics are largely superficial fields, serving primarily to cultivate a new class of power brokers rather than genuinely addressing the challenges posed by artificial intelligence. The commentary argues that the focus on formalized ethical frameworks distracts from what should be the ultimate goal in AI development: fostering open-source solutions. By emphasizing open-source as a guiding principle, the piece suggests that authentic collaborative efforts will inherently lead to ethical practices and safe applications of AI technologies through community consensus and transparency. This perspective is significant for the AI/ML community as it challenges the prevailing discourse around formal ethics and safety protocols in AI development, proposing instead that the natural development of ethical standards will emerge from shared, open-source efforts. This stance raises important implications for how the field approaches governance and accountability in AI systems, potentially redefining priorities toward more collective, grassroots innovations instead of bureaucratic frameworks that may lack real-world effectiveness. The debate underscores a critical need for the community to reassess the frameworks that guide AI advancement and their actual impact on society.