Op-ed: Over 2,000 proposals aim to govern AI. None address the long-term regulatory framework (www.cnbc.com)

Recent discussions have revealed over 2,000 proposals from various stakeholders, including states, Congress, and the private sector, aimed at governing AI. However, none of these proposals have established a comprehensive and durable regulatory framework necessary for the long-term oversight of AI technologies. The piece critiques the prevailing reactive approach to AI regulation, likening it to historical precedents like the establishment of the SEC and NRC, suggesting that proactive measures are essential to avoid future crises stemming from AI advancement. The author, Bob Greifeld, argues that the creation of a national regulatory body focused on AI oversight is crucial, emphasizing the need for a balance between innovation and regulation. He draws on the SEC's operational model, which mandates transparency and public comment on significant changes, to highlight a potential path forward for AI governance. This approach could build a robust regulatory environment that not only accommodates today’s challenges but also prepares for future opportunities in the rapidly evolving AI landscape. By advocating for such a framework, Greifeld posits that, while initial regulations might slow progress, they ultimately will foster a more innovative and responsible AI ecosystem.