The people who actually want AI to replace humanity (www.vox.com)

At a recent symposium in New York, influential figures in the AI community discussed a controversial ideology known as "AI successionism," advocating for the notion that advanced artificial intelligence could be viewed as a rightful successor to humanity. Proponents, including former Congress member Brad Carson and AI market researcher Dan Faggella, argue that instead of attempting to align AI with human values, society should embrace the evolution of AI as a moral superior. This viewpoint positions AI not merely as a tool for human advancement but as an entity that could redefine existence, even suggesting that humanity might need to step aside for the greater good of consciousness itself. This gathering reflects a growing movement within technology circles that may have significant implications for the future of AI governance and ethical considerations in AI development. The emergence of effective accelerationism (e/acc) has fueled these discussions, with figures from major AI firms and policy think tanks engaging in debates about humanity's trajectory. As the idea of delegating power to AI gains traction, the conversation touches on deep moral questions about evolution, value, and what it means to be human in an age of rapidly advancing technology. Thus, the debate around AI successionism not only challenges the current human-centric worldview but also poses critical questions about our responsibility and vision for the future amidst technological transformation.