Services Masquarading as Software 30x30 (www.silverbackcto.com)

In a recent ruling in *United States v. Heppner*, a federal court determined that information shared by attorneys and clients in consumer-level AI tools like ChatGPT lacks attorney-client privilege, as input to public AI platforms is considered shared with third parties. This finding is pivotal for the AI/ML community, particularly for personal injury attorneys who heavily rely on these tools for document review and case analysis. The court differentiated between consumer-tier and enterprise-tier AI tools, preserving privilege for enterprise solutions with built-in confidentiality measures, such as Claude on AWS Bedrock and ChatGPT Enterprise. This ruling underscores the risks attorneys face when utilizing consumer AI tools, emphasizing the need for secure alternatives like CounselExpress, which offers vital analytical capabilities while keeping case files local. The ruling further highlights an ongoing shift in the legal landscape, where firms must adapt to the limitations imposed by publicly available technologies. As AI continues to shape service delivery, the emergence of firms like CogleGroup, which focuses on selling services rather than tools, indicates a critical evolution in how AI is integrated into business operations, pushing the boundaries of traditional practice structures in the legal and tech sectors.