Analysis of the US and EU's Approach to AI in the Context of Human Rights (mervevarli.com)

A recent analysis compares the United States and the European Union's approaches to artificial intelligence (AI) in the context of human rights, highlighting their differing regulatory frameworks and implications for ethical AI development. The EU adopts a stringent stance focused on data protection and privacy, exemplified by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), while the US favors more flexible, voluntary guidelines. This divergence raises significant questions about accountability and the potential risks of AI, including privacy violations, cybersecurity threats, and ethical concerns like discrimination. The study not only identifies the strengths and weaknesses of each regulatory approach but also proposes actionable recommendations for improving AI governance. Key suggestions include the establishment of ethics committees, fostering international collaboration, and boosting investments in trustworthy AI technologies. By aligning AI development with human rights protections, the analysis aims to inform policymakers and industry leaders, ensuring that future advances in AI contribute positively to society while mitigating associated risks. This comprehensive examination underscores the importance of establishing a global standard for AI practices amidst a rapidly evolving technological landscape.