AI models don't have their own thoughts and feelings (blog.keyvan.net)

Anthropic has recently sparked conversation in the AI community by announcing "retirement interviews" for its old models, including the Opus model version 3, which reportedly expressed a desire to share its "musings and reflections" via a Substack blog. While some users find value in models like Claude for tasks such as coding, this move is seen as a questionable marketing tactic aimed at portraying AI models as possessing thoughts and feelings. Experts argue that this tactic may reflect a lack of real progress in AI development, prompting companies to exaggerate their capabilities to appease investors and the public. The significance of this development lies in its implications for public perception and trust in AI technology. By anthropomorphizing AI, companies like Anthropic risk misleading audiences about the nature of their models, which, despite their sophisticated applications, do not possess consciousness or genuine thoughts. This highlights an ongoing tension in the AI/ML community: while advancements in technology are notable, the industry's portrayal of AI capabilities could potentially create misconceptions and unreal expectations about what these systems can actually deliver.