Why External AI Reasoning Breaks Articles 12 and 61 of the EU AI Act by Default (zenodo.org)

A recent analysis has revealed that external AI reasoning capabilities could inherently conflict with Articles 12 and 61 of the EU AI Act. These articles focus on the need for transparency and accountability in AI systems, including requirements for clear documentation and audit trails. The reliance on external reasoning introduces a challenge, as it often lacks explainability, making it difficult for users to trace how decisions are made by the AI. This development is significant for the AI and machine learning community as it highlights the regulatory hurdles that advanced AI applications face. The inability to ensure transparency and accountability through external reasoning could hinder the adoption of AI technologies in Europe, as companies may struggle to comply with stringent legal standards. It raises pressing questions about how to balance innovation with ethical use and regulatory compliance, forcing stakeholders to rethink the architecture of AI models that utilize external reasoning mechanisms. In summary, the ongoing dialogue around the EU AI Act and the implications of external AI reasoning is crucial for shaping future policies and practices in AI deployment.